首页> 外文OA文献 >Causal inference in transportation safety studies: Comparison of potential outcomes and causal diagrams
【2h】

Causal inference in transportation safety studies: Comparison of potential outcomes and causal diagrams

机译:交通安全研究中的因果推断:比较   潜在的结果和因果图

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The research questions that motivate transportation safety studies are causalin nature. Safety researchers typically use observational data to answer suchquestions, but often without appropriate causal inference methodology. Thefield of causal inference presents several modeling frameworks for probingempirical data to assess causal relations. This paper focuses on exploring theapplicability of two such modeling frameworks---Causal Diagrams and PotentialOutcomes---for a specific transportation safety problem. The causal effects ofpavement marking retroreflectivity on safety of a road segment were estimated.More specifically, the results based on three different implementations ofthese frameworks on a real data set were compared: Inverse Propensity ScoreWeighting with regression adjustment and Propensity Score Matching withregression adjustment versus Causal Bayesian Network. The effect of increasedpavement marking retroreflectivity was generally found to reduce theprobability of target nighttime crashes. However, we found that the magnitudeof the causal effects estimated are sensitive to the method used and to theassumptions being violated.
机译:激励运输安全研究的研究问题是考萨林性质。安全研究人员通常使用观察数据来回答此类问题,但通常没有适当的因果推论方法。因果推理领域提供了几种用于探索经验数据以评估因果关系的建模框架。本文着重探讨两个这样的建模框架-因果图和潜在结果-对于特定运输安全问题的适用性。估计了道路标记的反光性对路段安全性的因果影响。更具体地,比较了在真实数据集上基于这些框架的三种不同实现的结果:具有回归调整的逆倾向得分加权和具有回归调整的倾向得分匹配与因果贝叶斯网络。人们普遍发现,增加路面标记的后向反射性会降低目标夜间坠毁的可能性。但是,我们发现所估计的因果效应的大小对所使用的方法和违反假设的情况很敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号